Mexico's High-Technology Solution to Illegal Immigration

By John W. Lillpop

"Mexico to use biochip to control illegal immigration," screamed the headline at earthtimes.org late last year. Without reading the small print, one could be lulled into assuming that our third-world neighbors were finally getting the message:

Illegal aliens from Mexico are most unwelcome in America!

Yahoo! would be an understatement of the reaction from these quarters should Mexico treat America like the world's sole superpower instead of a combination garbage dumpsite and day care center for illiterate peasants.

But, alas, the small print put the cork back in the champagne, for a couple of days anyway.

Turns out the aggressive program for dealing with illegal aliens pertains to foreigners entering Mexico through its southern border. You know, the untouchables from Guatemala that Mexican authorities have zero tolerance for.

Earthtime: http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/165487.html

That means that nothing has changed with regard to Mexico and its citizens intent on leaving Mexico to invade America. The Mexican government continues to hand out Map Quest and detailed instructions on how to invade Arizona.

In Spanish, of course.

According to the referenced Earthtime article, in 2006 the Mexican government nabbed 200,000 people trying to invade Mexico.

And how did Mexico handle those 200,000 invaders? Deport them back to Guatemala? Send them to prison to work on chain gangs for years on end?

Yahoo! NOT. Under the leadership of brilliant politicians like Vicente Fox and Felipe Calderon, the 200,000 were sold map quest maps, driven to the Arizona border, and forced to continue their northward journey across U.S. borders.

Incidentally, these are the same dunderhead politicians who threatened to take the U.S. to the United Nations because our government plans to build a border fence on U.S. property, using U.S. treasury!

The really big question: Are Mexican officials terminally stupid, terminally arrogant, or an ungodly combination of both?

A Worthy Resolution for 2008: Give Rule of Law a Chance!

By John W. Lillpop


The year about to be relegated to the annals of history bore witness to a profound awakening of the American people. In great numbers, We The People finally became aware of the fact that our elected officials have allowed as many as 38 million foreign peasants to thumb their noses at our borders, ignore our immigration laws, and occupy our nation.

With the awakening came action. On multiple occasions, President George W. Bush and accomplices in the Congress attempted to grant carte blanche amnesty to millions of invaders from south of our borders.

On each occasion, We The People rose to the occasion and went to war against conniving politicians whose first priority was to deliver a steady flow of cheap labor to big business and cheap votes to the Democrat party.

Using an arsenal of keyboards, high speed modems, fax machines, and tens of thousands of angry telephone calls, we let it be known that the priorities established by President Bush and the U.S. Congress were completely unacceptable.

We The People bombarded our elected representatives with the same message over and over and over again: It is not acceptable to sacrifice American sovereignty, the rule of law, and homeland security for cheap fruit and tomatoes.

Further, any "reform" that does not call for deportation of all illegal aliens, and which places the invaders on a path to citizenship, is amnesty. Pure and simple.

Amnesty is unacceptable. Pure and simple.

The people's rejection of amnesty has elitists in Washington wringing their hands in angst at what to do next. The status quo, they say, is unacceptable.

They are quite right about that, you know.

But America does NOT need to legalize 38 illegal aliens in order to solve the illegal alien crisis.

Existing laws, while not perfect, provide a more than adequate remedy. Those laws prohibit U.S. employers from hiring illegal aliens and mandate deportation of those here illegally.

All that is lacking is a commitment on the part of the president and the U.S. Congress to uphold their constitutional responsibilities.

Why not try this simple formula?

* Secure the borders with military force;

* Prosecute employers who hire illegal aliens, and

* Enforce all immigration laws, including deportations.

Our elected officials need to focus on the needs of the American people, rather than worrying about invading criminals being forced to "live in the shadows."

To hell with people living in shadows! Illegal aliens do not have any moral or legal basis for being here, and belong in the shadows, at least until our leaders muster enough cajones to deport them en masse.

Or, to put the issue in terms even an open borders advocate could understand, "Give Rule of Law a Chance!"

Why not make that a New Year's Resolution Mr. President and Ladies and Gentlemen of the U.S. Congress?

Ramos and Compean: Not Brown Enough?

By John W. Lillpop

Pity poor souls Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean. Owing to poor career and lifestyle choices and just plain rotten luck, the two have been cheated out of twelve and eleven years of freedom, respectively.

In reality, Ramos and Compean have only themselves to blame. Each foolishly chose to serve America in law enforcement, which meant a commitment to secure borders, the rule of law, and American sovereignty as agents of the Border Patrol.

Obviously terrible choices, especially for young Hispanic men better suited for flipping Big Macs, mowing lawns, washing cars and marching to protest the rule of law.

Even more incredible, the two actually chose to do their jobs to the best of their abilities. That really pushed the envelope.

The final straw came when Ramos and Compean chased illegal alien Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila back across the Mexican border, thereby preventing the thug from smuggling drugs into America.

Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila left America sans a few grams of brown buttocks blasted off his criminal being by a single shot from Ramos or Compean.

However, Aldrete-Davila was not injured too gravely, as he attempted to smuggle a "second load" of drugs into the U.S. on November 15, an indiscretion for which he was arrested.

WND: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58727

Unfortunately, last year our government was able to convict Ramos and Compean based on testimony provided by the drug smuggling illegal alien, Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila. That conviction lead to the brutal sentences imposed on the two in October 2006.

If only Ramos and Compean had been illegal aliens, things would have surely worked out differently.

To begin with, Ramos and Compean would have been defended by the ACLU, La Raza, the Democrat candidates for president, Hispanic civil rights activists, and stoked by Hispanic apologists Gerald Rivera and Rick Sanchez in the media.

Charges of racism and bigotry would have been levied against the prosecutors, and the sentences would have started a political firestorm of rage from coast to coast.

If the two had been illegal aliens, that is.

But Ramos and Compean are not illegal aliens. They are responsible American citizens who took their law enforcement responsibilitites seriously. As a result, the silence coming from the ACLU, La Raza and other Hispanic advocacy groups has been downright deafening.

Want to drive your blood pressure off the charts? Compare the injustice imposed upon Ramos and Compean with the fate of illegal alien Hector Velazquez-Nava.

This vermin from Mexico slammed his SUV into a car driven by director Bob Clark, famous for his award-winning film, A Christmas Story, in 1983. The crash killed both Clark and his 22-year-old son, Ariel Hanrath-Clark.

Hector Velazquez-Nava, an illegal alien from Mexico, had a blood alcohol level three times the legal limit.

For killing two Americans while in a drunken stupor, illegal alien Hector Velazquez-Nava was sentenced to six years in prison.

For doing their sworn duties, Ramos and Compean were sentenced to twelve and eleven years.

Perhaps they are just not brown enough?

Remembering Bob Clark, Director of "A Christmas Story"

By John W. Lillpop


Yet another Christmas has been made more joyful by being able to watch Bob Clark's delightful film, "A Christmas Story."

In many American homes, Clark's 1983 award-winning film has joined "A Christmas Carol," "It's a Wonderful Life," and "Miracle on 34th Street" as mandatory Yuletide fare.

Christmas simply would not be the "most wonderful time of the year" without watching all four of these great movies at least once each December.

Unfortunately for all who love Christmas, Bob Clark was not around to celebrate this Christmas. That is so because the prolific filmmaker, whose career spanned four decades, was killed in an automobile crash caused by a drunken driver in California on April 4.

Hector Velazquez-Nava, an illegal alien from Mexico, had a blood alcohol level three times the legal limit when he claimed the lives of both Clark and his 22-year-old son, Ariel Hanrath-Clark.

On October 16, Hector Velazquez-Nava was sentenced to six years in prison after pleading no contest to two counts of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.

According to some estimates, about 13 Americans are slaughtered every day, on average, by drunken illegal aliens like Hector Velazquez-Nava.

WND: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53103


Despite the carnage caused by illegal aliens, the mainstream media refuses to acknowledge and report the extent of the problem. Political correctness seems more vital than objective reporting, at least in some leftist news rooms.

In addition to media malfeasance in reporting the facts, America's political leaders, including our president, constantly argue that those coming here illegally from Mexico should be welcomed en masse because they hold values common to the American people.

One wonders if our so-called leaders are even aware of the horrors involving illegal aliens, too much alcohol, and the slaughter of innocent Americans?

Or do they simply not care?

The simple truth is that illegal aliens are not all good hearted, hard working folks who just come here to work. Many are violent criminals who should be rounded up and booted out of America before they commit more crime.

Moreover, illegal aliens do not share American values.

By definition, all illegal aliens are criminals, but most Americans are not.

Another example: Driving while drunk is considered "cool" and "macho" in Mexican culture, but is seen as stupid and recklessly criminal in America.

The solution? Our borders should be militarized to keep invaders out, and those already here should be rounded up and forcibly removed as soon as possible.

Illegals Aliens Say Adios, America Says Gracias!

By John W. Lillpop

As one who is adamant in the belief that English should be the only language in America, I am loathe to use Spanish for any purpose whatsoever.

However, I am tempted to make an exception for the great news currently coming from Arizona and Oklahoma. Namely, illegal aliens by the thousands are packing their bags and heading back to Mexico.

It is called self-deportation and is happening because of tough new laws that make it miserable for illegal aliens and employers who hire them.

Therefore, I say Gracias to each and every illegal who goes home to Mexico, or other third world nation of origin. Do not come back, and don't bother to write, even if you can.

And to George W. Bush and like-minded Mexi-nazis in Congress who insist that deporting 38 million free loaders and scam artists is "impossible," I say Look at Arizona! and Look at Oklahoma!

Illegal aliens will self-deport if convinced that the authorities are serious about enforcing the law. They will not leave if our leaders are stupid enough to give them driver's licenses, in-state tuition fees, free health care, and other perks.

The solution is to be tough enough to cause self-deportation to kick in.

Comprehende?

Mitt Romney: Ronald Reagan Clone In Sacred Underwear?

By John W. Lillpop

Bleeding heart types looking for a "minority cause" to advocate on behalf of in the 2008 presidential elections are torn between the candidacies of a woman, two African- Americans, a Hispanic, and a former mayor of Cleveland who is more of a communist than Vladimir Putin.

Tough choices, those, and all of them Democrats.

In the interest of fairness, however, the name of Mitt Romney should be added to the shopping list of those searching for an oppressed minority to support.

As a practicing member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormons), Romney is aligned with one of the most persecuted and oppressed minorities in history. Even in these enlightened times, millions of Americans say they would not vote for the charismatic ex-governor of Massachusetts under any circumstances.

And in an amazing demonstration of religious bigotry, a New Hampshire liberal rag, the Concord Monitor, used its Sunday editorial pages to tell readers why they should not vote for Mitt Romney.

This "anti-endorsement" is unprecedented, unfair, un-American, and unwise.

Editors at the Concord Monitor even went so far as to warn readers that Romney must be stopped" because he lacks the core philosophical beliefs to be a trustworthy president."

IHT: http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/12/23/america/Romney-Anti-Endorsement.php

That particular bit of editorial malfeasance is a thinly veiled assault on Romney's Mormon faith, pure and simple.

Fact of the matter is that Mitt Romney is the most conservative candidate running for the White House. He is also the most experienced and qualified, a fact attested to by his service as the governor of liberal-infested Massachusetts, and by his enormously successful personal finances.

Mitt Romney knows how to work with people from diverse political backgrounds, how to overcome discrimination and adversity, and he knows how to run a large organization. No other candidate comes close to matching his qualifications for taking over the Oval Office on January 20, 2009.

Best of all, Romney is intelligent, articulate, and an eternal optimist. He is a contemporary clone of Ronald Reagan, but in sacred underwear.

Unlike Reagan, Romney attends church every Sunday. Which in the Mormon faith requires him to spend the majority of his Sunday either in church, or commuting to and from church.

Mitt Romney does not attend church just to provide television cameras and photographers with photo ops. He attends church to practice his faith, which is what church attendance is supposed to be all about.

Discipline, dedication, decisiveness, decency, and devotion are attributes that Mitt Romney has developed through his church. Those attributes are also an urgent need for the presidency.

Looking for an oppressed minority? Think Romney!

Is Arnold Terminating Common Sense in California's Budget Crisis?

By John W. Lillpop

Can sleeping with a Kennedy wipe out one's conservative DNA? How about sleeping with a Kennedy AND having a gay chief of staff named Susan Kennedy?

This seemingly impertinent query is posed in light of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's curious proposal to release as many as 20,000 "non-serious, non-violent" prisoners in order to stave off a budget deficit that is $14 billion, and counting.

An even more urgent question haunts one's fiduciary consciousness: Why in the hell has California spent even a nickel to house, fed, and provide medical care for 20,000 people whose indiscretions are so benign as to not be worth punishing?

In other words, why imprison these people to begin with? As a political pay back to the prison guard unions, perhaps?

Assuming that most, if not all, of the inmates are in prison for good and proper cause, why are California's lawmakers and governor not considering other cuts in spending such as these:

1. Illegal aliens are estimated to cost the state $10.5 billion each year! Why not cut all public services to those not in the U.S. legally?

WND:http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42474

2. California legislators are the highest paid in the nation, at an average of more than $110,000 per year. Whatever happened to service and community spirit? Replaced by greed and opportunism?


3. Regulatory meddling in every aspect of life is driving businesses and middle class folks out of California. Productive citizens are being replaced by freeloaders and scam artists from south of our border.

California does not need to release any prisoners in order to balance the state budget. We do, however, need responsible governance when it comes to illegal aliens, excessive regulation, and the salaries of elected leaders!

Bush Should Retire Early--In Mexico!

Satire By John W. Lillpop

To whom is George W. Bush more loyal and sympathetic? Illegal aliens from Mexico or American citizens?

For the answer, look carefully at the photo--it shows illegal aliens scaling a border fence to invade America. And where is our goofy president?

Look closer. That is W waving a Mexican flag as part of his greeting ceremony for a chunky Mexican illegal just after she hopped the fence! Satire!

Given W's untreatable Mexican fetish, it may be prudent to simply shove him out of Air Force One, swaddled in a golden parachute, somewhere over Mexico City.

Remember that the man is 61 years old, and is obviously growing weary and older by the minute. Burned out seems an appropriate diagnosis.

And why shouldn't he be burned out?

After all, working 24/7 to help millions of illiterate peasants invade America is hard work that would wear anyone out!

Even more taxing: Trying to convince non-retarded Americans that the invasion is good for the U.S. economy.

Still even more taxing: Selling the notion that granting amnesty and a path to citizenship to criminals is vital to the national interest.

Just keeping a straight face while delivering that snake oil pitch day after day would be enough to drive most people into mental meltdown.

One wonders: Is that where our president and Mexico's most powerful insider mole is headed?

Some of W's recent pronouncements seem to confirm that his mental stability is "borderline," to say the least:

In April, W roared that amnesty is needed to take pressure off the borders! 38million illegal aliens in our midst and there is too much pressure on the borders?

In May, W said that the amnesty bill before the senate would restore rule of law.

Really? That is almost like saying, "America is governed by the rule of law, except when inconvenient to large corporations and elitists. In which case, congress and the president will simply change the law to legalize what had been illegal, thereby acquitting those guilty of behavior once considered unlawful."

Using the same logic, perhaps we should work to end the crime of armed bank robbery by simply expunging laws that make it unlawful to rob banks?

It was also in May that W appointed a war czar to take over the messes he has created in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as any other wars he might fancy between now and January 20, 2009.

While he was at it, one wonders why W did not appoint a border czar to shut down the borders and begin deportations?

Or is that Michael Chertoff's responsibility when he is not busy campaigning for amnesty or auditioning for acting roles as The Anti-Christ?

In June, W declared that he will throw an extra $4.4 billion dollars at border security, if only the senate will reconsider S 1348.

This dilly begs the obvious question: If $4.4 billion will make America safer and is vital to homeland security, why has W not acted sooner?

Like September 12, 2001, just to pick a random date out of the air?

Clearly, W is struggling to keep track of his missteps and dances around the truth. He seems to be losing that battle, and needs a long, long, stress free vacation.

We the American people also need a rest. We are BUSHed, to put it mildly.

And other than Bush 41 and his sidekick, Moms Bush, who honestly believes that America can survive another 12.5 months of the W "Presidency and Legacy Building Enterprise?"

Perhaps a few patriotic Republicans should quietly visit the Oval Office and convince W to hang up his pilot's helmet and take early retirement.

Offer him an attractive golden parachute package and a luxurious villa in Mexico, and W might just take the bait.

Dropping W on the Mexican side of the border would serve other purposes:

Americans would exact a measure of revenge against Mexico for dumping millions of illegal aliens on the American side of the border, and

Best of all, America would have one less English-challenged amnesty crusader to deal with!

God Bless American Patriot Tom Tancredo!

By John W. Lillpop

Of all the presidential candidates on both sides of the ideological divide, only one man really understands the issue of illegal immigration and its potential to destroy America.

That man, of course, is Tom Tancredo who has been unflinching in his support for securing our borders, enforcing the rule of law, defending American sovereignty, and preserving American language and culture.

Unlike his Republican colleagues, excepting only Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo has not found it necessary to "reinvent" himself by glossing over earlier positions on one of the most volatile issues in American history.

Representative Tancredo has been for America from the get go, and as such he has been a vocal opponent of illegal immigration for many years.

He had the courage to speak out against Republican President George W. Bush and the GOP Congress for failing to honor their sworn oaths to defend America from invasion.

Tancredo truly understands that unless illegal immigration is prevented, and reversed, America is destined to fall into a third-world abyss akin to that of Mexico and other Latin American nations that currently ship their problems north for U.S. taxpayers to contend with.

Until quite recently, Tom Tancredo was a "lone voice," when warning U.S. politicians and the public that America has been, and continues to be, invaded by millions of criminals from south of our border.

However, because of his intelligence and ability to articulate, Tom Tancredo has been a major force in bringing illegal immigration to the forefront of issues being debated in America.

Without Tom Tancredo sounding the alarm, the Democratic congress and our "conservative" president would surely have conspired to enact amnesty for the 38 million criminal aliens now here, which would have been seen as a big green light to another 40 million with designs on invading America.

In October, Tom Tancredo saddened patriots by announcing that he would not seek reelection as a representative from Colorado in the U.S. House. Terrible news, yes, but who can blame the gentleman for fleeing from the likes of Speaker Pelosi and other enemies of America now occupying the U.S. capitol?

Even worse news came on December 20 when Tom Tancredo announced that he was abandoning his presidential campaign.

Why, oh, why are we losing Tom Tancredo? Why not Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, or Mike Huckabee throwing in the towel? Why not give Fred Thompson last rites, and let him doze off while en route to Hollywood to star in another smash hit television series?

In the final analysis, Tom Tancredo has provided the American people with an invaluable public service by alerting us to the dangers of a cockeyed congress and president working against the best interests of We the people, the constituency they are supposed to serve.

While I regret that I will not have the chance to vote for Tom Tancredo for president in 2008, I take pride in the fact that I did vote for the man in 2004. Having had enough of Dubya to last a lifetime, I wrote in the name of Tom Tancredo for President.

That fact can be confirmed with the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters in California. Unless my ballot has been destroyed by an illegal alien working in the Registrar's office!

God bless and keep Tom Tancredo!

Fleeced Naive Duh?

By John W. Lillpop

To elitist renegades like George W. Bush, most Democrats and all RINOs, We the People are naive dimwits who can be ignored with impunity when it comes to deciding the future of America.

With such a mind set apparently the norm in Washington these days, is it any wonder that our government has undertaken the methodical "Mexicanization" of America, without regard to the wishes or desires of the American people?

In fact, rather than the traditional Merry Christmas greeting usually extended this time of year, an appropriate holiday greeting from Bush and his partners in crime on capitol hill should be " Fleeced Naive Duh!"

But regardless of the greeting, the facts are the same.

Namely, our government is fleecing We the Naive by:

Refusing to secure our borders during time of war, while ordering 160,000 young Americans into harm's way thousands of miles from home,

Allowing upwards of 38 million illegal aliens to occupy America, costing American taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars every year.

Allowing illegal aliens to dump medical bills on the backs of U.S. taxpayers, while the same illegals send $30-40 billion a year back to Mexico. This travesty drives medical centers out of business, making those facilities unavailable to American citizens for whom the facilities were intended.

Refusing to enforce existing immigration laws and claiming that it is "impossible" to deport invading criminals as required by law.

Failing to confront, or even protest, the incursion of armed Mexicans across our borders and on to American soil.

Incarcerating American citizens serving as border patrol agents for defending America from drug smuggling illegal aliens.

Pandering to illegal aliens who can not and/or will not speak English, thereby wasting taxpayer dollars to print documents in foreign languages.

Permitting federal, state, and local penal systems to become overrun by illegal aliens, again costing taxpayers billions each year.

Pampering illegal aliens with driver's licenses and free public services, which encourage even more invaders to come to America.

Instead of this Mexicanization of America, our politicians should be telling illegal aliens to "Go Home for Christmas--and Do Not Come Back!"

Why Does John McCain Hate the Rule of Law?

By John W. Lillpop

John McCain still does not get it on illegal aliens. In fact, he is not even close.

Rather than accepting the will of the people and committing to the rule of law, McCain continues his obstinate fight on behalf of illegal aliens, at the expense of the American people.

McCain's pandering to illegals hit a new low in November when the senator searched every nook and cranny for a viable excuse with which to oppose mass deportations. The best he could come up with was a specious argument based on a hypothetical crook and granny.

Speaking in Clemson, South Carolina, McCain responded to a question posed by a student by saying:

“If you’re prepared to send an 80-year-old grandmother who’s been here 70 years back to some country, then, frankly you’re not quite as compassionate as maybe I am,” McCain said.

AZSTARNET


With all due respect to Senator McCain and his alleged compassion, his hypothetical begs the following question: If his illegal alien granny has been in the U.S. for 70 years, why in the bloody hell did she not take advantage of the amnesty act of 1986?

Too lazy and or stupid? Unable to speak, read or understand English? All of the above?

The point is that America has been invaded by as many as 38 million illegal aliens since 1986. And since 9/11, the nation has been at war.

Especially during time of war, our borders must be secured and those here illegally must be hunted down and forced to leave.

If, while bolstering America's homeland security, an occasional 80-year-old granny here illegally is forced to return to her nation of birth, so be it!

Worrying about such situations should not concern elected officials who have a constitutional responsibility to enforce the law and defend the interests of the American people.

By the way, how about some compassion for American citizens for a change, senator?

How Do You Say, "I Gave At the Office," In Spanish?

By John W. Lillpop

Who would have imagined that the Salvation Army supposed model of all that is good and American is actually an underground conclave for KKK members and sympathizers?

What a shock to learn that that cheerful Santa with the bell and big smile is a closet racist who hates brown people.

Unfortunately, that is exactly the falsehood that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in cahoots with liberals like Nancy Pelosi would have you believe.

The Salvation Army (SA) has an English-only policy, which is permitted for businesses where employees interact heavily with the public. That policy applies across the board to all employees, including Hispanics.

Unfortunately, certain Hispanic employees in Framingham, Mass refused to learn English, although they had been advised to do so by SA more than a year ago. As a result, the employees were fired, as well they should have been.

Of course, a lawsuit was filed against the Salvation Army by American hating bureaucrats and English hating Hispanics.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi added to the chaos by refusing to bring to a vote a Senate-passed provision relaxing federal rules on employer English-only policies.

Here:
http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Speak+English%2C+Nancy%3A+Pelosi+stiffs+the+Salvation+Army&articleId=b398269f-23a9-4db3-9bd6-04ae5e8baf2a

As usual, the greatest priority of the Democrat party and its leaders is to cave to the demands of radical Hispanic members, regardless of the impact on non-Hispanics.

Once again, the culture and language of America have been plundered by Hispanics who refuse to assimilate into American culture, and who are coddled by out-of-touch Democrats who do not give a damn about anything except personal power.

That the Salvation Army is caught up in this despicable outrage by hostile Hispanics and gutless politicians is truly shameful.

Which reminds me, how Do You Say, "I Gave At the Office," in Spanish?

BUSH PARDONS TURKEYS, WHILE EAGLES REMAIN CAGED

The article linked below was authored by Dan Howard, a great American from Oklahoma and Founder of the patriotic web site titled, "Outraged Patriots." Dan has been instrumental in waking residents of Oklahoma to the illegal alien crisis in that state.

Newswithviews:




John W. Lillpop
11-22

Free American Heroes Ramos and Compean for Thanksgiving!

By John W. Lillpop

American patriots engaged in the war against the invasion of American by third world illegal aliens have much to be thankful for this Thanksgiving, including:

* Growing public awareness of the invasion crisis and public outrage over the
fact that upwards of 38 million illegal aliens are already in America.

* Defeat of amnesty and "Dream Act" legislation on multiple occasions in the U.S. Senate.

* Enactment of Oklahoma's tough new anti-illegal alien laws, and similar measures in state and local jurisdictions all across the nation.

* Implosion of Governor Eliot Spitzer as a result of his idiotic attempt to grant driver's license to illegal aliens.

* Hillary Clinton's reversal on driver's licenses based on the same public outrage that caused Eliot Spitzer to finally see sense.

Most of all, we should be grateful for the arrest and arraignment of Osvaldo Aldrete Davila.

Davila is the Mexican vermin who was instrumental in the prosecution of American heroes Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean because the Bush administration stupidly accepted the word of an illegal alien drug smuggler over that of border patrol agents.

Davila's drugs smuggling days appear to be over, another blessing to give thanks for.

President Bush can add to the Thanksgiving glow by reversing a grave miscarriage of justice heaped upon Messrs. Ramos and Compean.

Specifically, the president should issue a full and unconditional pardon to Ramos and Compean, and release these patriots to their families in time for Thanksgiving.

Additionally, the two should be reinstated to their positions as Border Patrol agents, and be reimbursed for each and every dime of lost pay while they were victimized for doing their jobs.

While GW Bush has an affinity for favoring illegal aliens over American citizens, an exception should be made in the case of Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean.

After all, Mr. President, they were doing that which you steadfastly refuse to do: Namely, defend America from invading criminals.

Free Ramos and Compean so they can spend Thanksgiving with their families!

Happy Thanksgiving from “Good hearted, Hard working” Illegal Aliens

By John W. Lillpop

Growing up in a Christian home, I was taught that it is especially important to be charitable and giving at Thanksgiving and Christmas in honor of the birth, life, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

However, to the best of my recollection, my parents did not advocate stupidity at Thanksgiving, or at any other time of year for that matter.

For example, although my mother lectured me endlessly about not wasting food because people in China were starving, I do not recall that she favored bringing tens of millions of non-English speaking Chinese into America illegally so that we could take care of them.

But we were poor, so perhaps my perspective is skewed. How poor were the Lillpops? Well, we usually got CARE packages from Korea at Christmas!

Unlike my parents, President George W. Bush, in concert with RINO and Democrat politicians and the mainstream media, seem totally shrouded in stupidity when it comes to illegal immigration.

Bush and company seem to have greater regard for illegal aliens than for taxpaying American citizens.

President Bush is particularly fond of referring to Mexican illegal aliens as hardworking, goodhearted folks who should be granted citizenship because they invaded America only in pursuit of a better life.

With all due respect to the president, I suspect that “pursuing a better life” is the universal excuse used by bank robbers, home burglars, auto thieves, extortionists, drug dealers, forgers, pimps, hard-money loan brokers, dentists, and other criminals to justify taking that to which they are not entitled.

Should we grant pardons to all such criminals, and welcome them carte blanche into mainstream American life? And if such a foolish policy were implemented, what would stop others from simply taking what they desire without regard to ownership, morality, or fairness?

Moreover, some startling facts and figures from the Los Angeles Times and other news outlets should cause any sane person to question the president’s judgment when it comes to criminals from Mexico.

For example:


* 40% of workers in Los Angeles County work for cash and pay no taxes, because they are predominantly illegal aliens without green cards.

* 95% of murder warrants issued in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens.

* 75% of those on the “most wanted” list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens.

* Over 67% of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal aliens.
(Mexican births paid for by U.S. taxpayers.)

* Nearly 25% of all inmates in California detention centers are here illegally.

* Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.

* 50% of gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border, according to FBI reports.

* 60% of all occupants in HUD properties are illegal aliens.

* 21 radio stations in Los Angeles are Spanish-language.

* In Los Angeles County, 5.1 million people speak English, while
3.9 million speak Spanish.

* Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops, but 29% are on welfare.

* In 1997, the net cost of immigration to American taxpayers was $70 billion. The lifetime fiscal impact (taxes paid minus services received) for the average adult Mexican immigrant is a negative number.

* 29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens.


Why not break with tradition this Thanksgiving, President Bush, and enforce the rule of law as you are required to do by the U.S. Constitution? A plan for deporting 38 million turkeys here illegally back to their third world Mexico would be a terrific start.

Doing so would provide the American people with a wonderful reason for being thankful!

Is America's Immigration System Really Broken? If So, Who Broke It?

By John W. Lillpop

Open borders advocates, intent on transforming America into a third world cesspool akin to Mexico, have rolled out yet another loony slogan in their attempt to keep the U.S. from securing our borders, enforcing the law, and deporting illegal aliens.

The latest refrain spewing from leftists is, "America's immigration system is broken. We cannot stop illegal immigration without comprehensive immigration reform."

That putrid animal waste is spread by the likes of President Bush, Senator Hillary Clinton, all Democrats, and most RINOs. It also comes from Felipe Calderon and Vicente Fox, present and past presidents of third world Mexico, as well as from Mexican folk hero Elvira Arrellano, an acknowledged expert in deportation and the use of organized religion as a wedge against the rule of law.

Each of these political luminaries makes the absurd "Broken System" charge without attempting to address the pertinent question, "Who broke it?"

In fact, the immigration system is not broken at all! Existing immigration laws will work perfectly fine, provided such laws are enforced.

Regrettably, America's worst president in history, George W. Bush, in concert with traitors in the U.S. Congress, refuse to enforce existing immigration laws, even in the wake of 9/11 and the global war on terror.

Instead, our so-called leaders blather on and on about "comprehensive" reform, which is liberal-speak for amnesty. In truth, comprehensive reform is the Monopoly- game equivalent of "get out of jail" cards for 38 million criminal freeloaders and scam artists.

But caution unto those who believe that We the People can be played forever like a board game! As President Bush, Governor Eliot Spitzer, and Senator Hillary Clinton are learning, there is a limit to the amount of stupidity that the American people will countenance. That limit is breached by the 'broken system' idiocy.

A new rallying cry is emerging from sea to shining sea. That cry is simply, "America don't need no stinkin' immigration reform!"

Prudent politicians interested in a legacy, or a future in politics, will heed that cry. Or perish.

This Prominent Democrat Called Illegal Aliens 'Free Loaders and Scam Artists'

By John W. Lillpop

Most liberals regard illegal aliens as “Undocumented Democrats” and a veritable gold mine of opportunity for holding on to political power by coddling to those here unlawfully and Hispanics in general.

For that reason, most Democrat politicians have abandoned patriotic concern about homeland security, the rule of law, stability of the American economy and social order, and preservation of American language and culture.

In fact, one can search high and low for a liberal with a patriotic, pro-America stance on illegal immigration, and that search will usually be futile.

But there is a notable exception: A U.S. Senator who has shown remarkable wisdom, foresight, and clarity, especially for a Democrat.

His office released the following statements (in bold) concerning illegal immigration:

“In response to increased terrorism and abuse of social programs by aliens, (I) today introduced the first and only comprehensive immigration reform bill in Congress. Currently, an alien living illegally in the United States often pays no taxes but receives unemployment, welfare, free medical care, and other federal benefits. Recent terrorist acts, including the World Trade Center bombing, have underscored the need to keep violent criminals out of the country.”

The senator’s bill, titled the “Immigration Stabilization Act,” overhauls the nation's immigration laws, and calls for a massive scale-down of immigrants allowed into the country. The bill also changes asylum laws to prevent phony asylum seekers.

The senator said the U.S. open door policy is being abused at the expense of honest, working citizens.

The senator continued:

"We are a country founded upon fairness and justice. An individual in real threat of torture or long-term incarceration because of his or her political beliefs can still seek asylum. But this bill closes the door to those who want to abuse America's inherent generosity and legal system.”

"Our borders have overflowed with illegal immigrants placing tremendous burdens on our criminal justice system, schools and social programs. The Immigration and Naturalization Service needs the ability to step up enforcement. Our federal wallet is stretched to the limit by illegal aliens getting welfare, food stamps, medical care, and other benefits often without paying any taxes.”

“Safeguards like welfare and free medical care are in place to boost Americans in need of short-term assistance. These programs were not meant to entice freeloaders and scam artists from around the world. Even worse, Americans have seen heinous crimes committed by individuals who are here illegally.”


Specific provisions proposed by the senator in the Immigration Stabilization Act include:

* Reduces annual legal immigration levels. Relatives other than spouse or minor children admitted only if already on immigration waiting lists and their admission does not raise annual immigration levels above approved level.

* Reforms asylum rules to prevent aliens from entering the United States illegally under phony "asylum" claims.

* Expands list of felonies considered "aggravated" felonies requiring exclusion and deportation of criminal aliens. Allows courts to order deportation at time of sentencing.

* Increases penalties for failing to depart or re-entering the United States after a final order of deportation order. Increases maximum penalties for visa fraud from five years to 10 years.

* Curtails alien smuggling by authorizing interdiction and repatriation of aliens seeking to enter the United States unlawfully by sea. Increases penalties for alien smuggling.

* Adds "alien smuggling" to the list of crimes subject to sanctions under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.

* Expands the categories of property that are forfeited when used to facilitate the smuggling or harboring of illegal aliens.

* Clarifies that a person born in the United States to an alien mother who is not a lawful resident is not a U.S. citizen. This will eliminate incentive for pregnant alien women to enter the United States illegally, often at risk to mother and child, for the purpose of acquiring citizenship for the child and accompanying federal financial benefits.

* Mandates that aliens who cannot demonstrably support themselves without public or private assistance are excludable. This will prevent admission of aliens likely to be dependent on public financial support. This requirement extends to the sponsor of any family sponsored immigrant.

* Increases border security and patrol officer positions."

What sort of a Democrat would take such a politically incorrect--but morally and legally correct--stance?

Perhaps the Democrat with a brain is Zell Miller from the great state of Georgia? Or could it be a reincarnation of Alabama’s late conservative firebrand, George Wallace?

The answer: None of the above!

In fact, Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.) introduced the Immigration Stabilization Act in the United States Senate in 1993. The statements quoted above are from a press release issued by Reid’s office on August 5, 1993.

How is it that Harry Reid was exactly right more than 13 years ago, but is so completely wrong now? Why does Reid oppose programs he once sponsored now that the problem is seven times greater after 9/11?

In the spring of 2006, while the U.S. Senate was debating legislation to make English the official U.S. language, Reid even saw fit to drag out the R word to slander those who supported the English bill.

And, of course, Reid has voted for Mexico and against America every time the U.S. Senate has considered amnesty.

Harry Reid: Against illegal immigration, before he was for it!

Why?


Source: http://levin.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjJmNzE3MTg5MDJhYzM4OTM5OGMwOGM5ZTNhYzJlYmE

English vs. Spanish: A Question of Racism?

By John W. Lillpop

In a rare show of wisdom, several years ago California voters passed Proposition 227 to abolish most forms of bilingual education. The premise was quite simple: When English is not spoken in the home, youngsters are at a decided disadvantage, and must, therefore, receive intensive English instruction elsewhere.

Pampering non-English speaking youngsters with bilingual instruction at school was correctly seen as counterproductive and not in the best interests of the young learners.

Unfortunately, some Hispanics educators still refuse to abide by the law and continue to teach in Spanish. One such so-called educator was recently recognized as “Teacher of the Year” by a San Diego school district. Pancho, which is not his real name, proclaimed it his duty to instruct Hispanics in their native tongue, and hailed his defiance of state law as a major accomplishment.

Were it not for the fact that California’s educational system is administered almost exclusively by out-of-touch liberals, Pancho would have been immediately fired and his teaching credentials, if any, permanently revoked.

By refusing to expose his students to the language needed to succeed in America, Pancho should also be arrested and charged with child endangerment/abuse.

As an educator, Pancho should know that California now requires students to pass a test in order to graduate from high school. One of the test subjects is English proficiency.

Do you get that, Pancho? English, not Spanish, is a requirement for high school graduation in California. The state does not test for Spanish proficiency because English is the predominate language in California and throughout the United States.

Does that bother you, Pancho? Get over it--that is the law.

Pancho probably regards those who want English to be the official language in America as “racists.”

Question to Pancho: If I am a racist for wanting English to be the official American language, by the same logic are you not a racist for preferring Spanish over English?

Given his state of confusion, Pancho probably believes that his defiance of state law is perfectly justified because bilingual education means diversity. To California liberals, “Our diversity is our greatest strength” is recognized and accepted as the new oath of allegiance to socialism.

California parents, Hispanics included, please remember this: English proficiency is required to graduate high school in California. Spanish proficiency is required to pick fruit and clean toilets.

Which future do you want for your child?

Shortage of Farm Workers? Let's Use Protesting Illegal Aliens!

Why not use illegal alien protestors to pick grapes and tomatoes?

By John W. Lillpop

Democrat politicians and certain RINOs, including our addled president, are always looking for new ways to ram illegal aliens down the throats of reluctant Americans. In the latest scam, these anti-American knot heads are passing out crying towels to gain support for agricultural tycoons who allegedly face a shortage of farm workers.

Prudent citizens: Save your tears and pity for both the corrupt farmers and the illegal aliens that they are so fond of.

To begin with, growers should not hire illegal aliens. To do so is a violation of U.S. laws, and is a major reason why America is saddled now with upwards of 38 million illegal aliens.

Secondly, how can there be a "shortage of workers" in a nation that is overwhelmed and overrun by illegal aliens?

For example, just last spring, Americans were horrified at the sight of huge crowds of illegal aliens marching through our streets to protest the rule of law.

Why not round up these criminals, outfit them with straw hats, picking buckets, and other required farm-work paraphernalia, and ship them to the nearest needy grower?

In addition, jail systems throughout America already use incarcerated inmates to clean parks and roadways.

Why not force those here illegally, and in jail or prison, to meet the needs of the American people by picking grapes or tomatoes?

Other venues for locating illegal immigrants: Day labor centers, Home Depot stores, welfare offices, food stamp distribution centers, car washes, fast food eateries, English-as-a-second-language (ESL) classes, and DNC offices everywhere.

Third, if farmers would pay competitive wages, their labor needs would be met by real Americans--citizens and others here legally.

Indeed, reports indicate that the “shortfall” of agricultural workers is at least partially the result of illegal aliens working in construction and other U.S. industries where they can earn more.

In other words, illegal aliens already here are no longer willing to pick produce and fruit.

So the dodo heads in Washington want to bring in more illegal aliens to do the work that illegals already here will not do? That sounds like a "GW Bush" or a "Nancy Pelosi" moment!

Finally, much like this nation's addiction to foreign oil, America is hooked on slave labor from the third world.

This addiction represents a major threat to homeland security, national sovereignty, economic and social stability, and preservation of American values and culture.

America needs to end this insidious addiction to slave labor by doing the following:


* Secure our borders with military force.

* Deport all illegal aliens currently in the United States.

* Prosecute and punish all business owners that undermine national security by hiring illegal aliens.

* Hold the Mexican government accountable for its role in the invasion of America by third-world criminals.

By cutting off the flow of illegal aliens, American politicians can do what is right for working families, while at the same time fighting terrorism and preserving American culture.

That is a win-win, unless you are a Democrat or RINO!

Essential American Truths That Immigrants Must Accept

By John W. Lillpop

As the debate over immigration rages on and on, it is clear that many Hispanics, including those here legally, and advocate groups such as La Raza and the ACLU who work on behalf of illegal aliens, need to understand and accept the following essential truths about America:

* In 1848, The Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo was ratified by both the U.S. and Mexican Congresses. That Treaty ended any and all claims Mexico had to land now a part of the United States.

* Native American Indians were the original owners of the American southwest. Were there were any valid property rights claims concerning that land, such rights would belong to Native American Indians, not Mexicans.

* America is a sovereign nation, totally independent of Mexico. It has been that way for over 200 years. We intend to keep it that way.

* In America, Mexico is considered a foreign nation and Spanish is a foreign language.

* America operates according to the rule of law which applies to everyone. This is true whether one is brown, black, yellow, lily-white, red, or an exotic hybrid of lavender and green.

* Being hard-working and good hearted is commendable. But those qualities do NOT entitle anyone to enter America illegally.

* Bilingualism is cool--provided one of the languages is English. Literacy in only Mexican and Spanish es no bueno in America.

* Celebrating one's cultural heritage is perfectly fine--as long as it does not interfere with prompt and complete assimilation into American culture.

* Driving while loaded or drunk may be "macho" in Mexico. But in America, driving under the influence is considered stupid and criminal and is not tolerated, regardless of one's country of origin or cultural heritage.

* People here illegally are criminals, and as such, are most unwelcome. American citizens will fight to have such miscreants deported, regardless of whether or not families are involved. Illegal is illegal, family or not.

* Demanding that our borders be secured and that the law be enforced is the right of all American citizens and doing so does not make any one a racist or bigot.

* U.S. immigration laws exist to protect American citizens and others that are here legally, not to facilitate a foreigner's pursuit of a better life.

* Those who come to America must adjust to our culture and traditions. We have no obligation or desire to change in deference to foreign newcomers,and

* Brown may be beautiful in Mexico. But in America, we are partial to colors that symbolize freedom under the rule of law. That would be Red, White and Blue.

Illegal aliens: Take this list with you when you are deported back to Mexico, and share it with other Mexicans considering invading.

Your experience may cause them to reconsider, and that would be a good thing!


John W. Lillpop
San Jose, Ca

Why Illegal Aliens Invade America

By John W. Lillpop


Those who give a damn about America are outraged over the fact that the Mexican government does not respect American sovereignty, borders, or immigration laws. It was, and is, my contention that because of its warped policies on illegal immigration, Mexico is very much an enemy of America.

To my complete amazement, there were those who actually disagree with my astute conclusions.

However, none offer a logical rebuttal. Rather, illegal aliens are defended as goodhearted, hardworking folks who come to America because they share our values and come simply in search of a better life. It is even suggested that the invaders are a “blessing” to America.

In truth, however, illegal aliens do not invade the U.S. to work or because they share common values. They come to steal public services—education, health care and the like--to which they are not entitled, and which cost U.S. taxpayers scores of billions of dollars each year.

As to common values, most Americans are NOT criminals—all illegal aliens are. Most Americans speak English—most illegal aliens refuse to learn the American language.

In addition, many illegal aliens are delusional enough to believe that parts of the U.S. still belong to Mexico. They come not to share in the “American Dream,” but to reclaim property that they stupidly believe to be part of Mexico.

As everyone knows, the Mexican government bitterly opposes efforts to stem the flow of illegal aliens from Mexico into America. That government has even threatened to take the United States to the UN because we Americans have plans to build a fence at the border.

A fence that would be built by Americans on American soil using American money!

However, when it comes to illegal aliens going into Mexico from countries south of its border, the Mexican government has absolutely zero tolerance. No driver’s licenses, in-state tuition, or any of the other nonsense that American politicians foolishly bestow on Mexicans here illegally.

Fact is, illegal aliens in Mexico are regarded as felons by the government, treated accordingly, and are deported as quickly as possible. America officials should do the same to the scores millions of aliens here illegally.

To claim that America is somehow “blessed” to have a third-world neighbor that dumps 38 million criminals on the backs of U.S. taxpayers is outrageous, irresponsible, and foolish

No other nation on earth would tolerate a “neighbor” like Mexico—and neither should America!

Oklahoma!

By John W. Lillpop

As of November 1, 2007, Oklahoma is the beacon of light and hope for those seeking escape from liberal-begotten insanity when it comes to illegal aliens.

That is so because U.S. District Judge James H. Payne denied a request for a Preliminary Injunction against H.B. 1804, Oklahoma's common sense bill for dealing with the out-of-control invasion by illegal aliens.

As a result, H.B. 1804 is now the law of the land in Oklahoma. Let the self-deportations and state-assisted deportations begin!

Are you listening Eliot Spitzer and Hillary Clinton?

During the Democrat debate on October 30, Mrs. Clinton was asked her view on Governor Spitzer's idiotic deal to give driver's licenses to illegal aliens.

Clinton replied by asking, " What is the governor supposed to do? He is dealing with a serious problem."

Answer: What part of ILLEGAL do you and Spitzer not understand, Hillary?

Enforce the damned law!

As a former prosecutor and now the top law enforcement official in the state of New York, Governor Spitzer should be leading the charge to demand that ICE round up and deport illegal aliens, instead of licensing criminals to drive.

Enforce the damned law, Eliot!

Perhaps Governor Spitzer and Senator Clinton should visit the great state of Oklahoma to discover just how the rule of law and a passion for serving the interests of American citizens can combined to mitigate the cancer of illegal immigration.

Hint, hint: If one is serious about stopping and reversing illegal invasions, one does not reward invaders with driver's licenses, public services and other perks paid for by taxpayers!

Enforce the damned law, Governor Spitzer and Senator Clinton!

But will H.B. 1804 work?

The answer is provided by the Rev. Miguel Rivera, president of the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders, who said the following:

``I know 25,000 or more of my Latino people have been afraid and they have left this state.''

Although Rivera did not mention the fact that those leaving were illegal aliens, the point is obvious: H.B. 1804 was working perfectly even before it officially became law!

A message to all elected representatives and senators in the U.S. Congress, President Bush, and the people's servants in the several states:

Americans want enforcement of U.S. borders and existing immigration laws, not amnesty or a path to citizenship for invaders.

In other words, let's do as they do in Oklahoma:

Enforce the damn laws!

Comprehende?

Eliot Spitzer's Halloween Trick: Driver's Licenses for Illegal Aliens

By John W. Lillpop

In an extraordinary bit of political witchcraft most appropriate for Halloween, the federal government and Governor Eliot Spitzer of New York have reached a compromise that will allow New York to issue special driver's licenses to illegal aliens.

Newsday: http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--immigrantdrivers1027oct27,0,674004,print.story

Why any American politician of normal intelligence and even the slightest recollection of 9/11 would want to do something so utterly stupid is puzzling.

In any event, the Spitzer scheme will provide illegal aliens with a unique ID that will clearly distinguish them as illegal. And that is supposed to help the invading peasants?

Think about it, Pedro. When you go to get your driver's license, you will have to be photographed with MEX tattooed on your forehead. That MEX will tell everyone in the universe that Pedro is an invading scumbag who should be arrested and shipped back to Mexico immediately, but who is nonetheless licensed to drive in New York.

Still, it is your choice, Pedro.

Oh, and by the way, the following message will be encrypted on your tamper-safe license. In English.

"My name is Pedro Ignacio Garcia. My wife and I came to America by crossing the border in Arizona on January 2, 2002. We had to sneak across the border into America because the U.S. immigration system is broken, at least that is what our Mexican government told us.

"Mexican officials told us to have as many children as possible as soon as possible once we got settled in America. We have had six children since; all of whom are American citizens that we are counting on to keep the U.S. government from sending my wife and I back to Mexico. We had planned to come to America in 2003, but we found that my wife was pregnant so we came in 2002 so that the triplets would be born in America.

"We came to America because we heard your president George Bush and Democrats like Eliot Spitzer and Harry Reid say many nice things about Mexicans who come to America illegally. We have heard that we can get driver's licenses and reduced tuition for our children in some of your states.

"One of the major attractions for us is your excellent system that provides free medical service, especially since I have no health insurance for myself or family. We are very concerned that some hospitals are closing because of the costs of serving poor people like us. We suggest that the health insurance premiums for Americans be increased to cover poor people from Mexico.

"I am proud of my Mexican heritage and love Spanish, the language of love. I believe that learning English is a waste of time so I do not bother. We have demanded that the public schools teach our children in Spanish. The Democrat party registered us in Spanish and the ballots we have voted with are all in Spanish. Who needs English? Even President Bush does not speak it very well, or so we have been told.

"We proudly fly the Mexican flag in remembrance of the fact that much of the land that is America was stolen from Mexico. Our children are being taught that retaking that land for Mexico is what God wants us to do.

"I am a potential carrier of deadly strains of tuberculosis and other diseases eradicated in the modern world 75 years ago, but which are still rampant in my beloved Mexico. That is why American citizens need to make sure me and my family receive the very best in medical care.

"I do not pay no stinkin' income taxes to any local, state or federal government. How else could I afford to work for wages that allow me to steal jobs from American citizens?

"I am an alcoholic and need to drive in order to get to AA meetings every night. Sometimes my AA amigos fall off the wagon briefly and take me with them. Those are the only times when I drink and drive. Except on Cinco de Mayo and other Mexican holidays.

"Our family is on welfare and food stamps even though we are not eligible. We have fake IDs that say we are legal, and we have social security numbers to prove it.

"We are saving our pesos to buy a big, beautiful home. But we are worried about the loan credit crisis now threatening to make credit inaccessible to illegal aliens. As with health insurance, we believe the solution is simple: Increase the interest rates paid by American citizens to cover the risk associated with lending to illegal aliens from Mexico.

"We hear that white people want to secure the U.S. borders to keep terrorists out. Phooey! Why would we Mexicans do harm to the land of free tacos, education, health care, food, and housing?

"Our favorite American heroes are, in this order: George Lopez, Mel Martinez, Eliot Spitzer, George Bush, and Hillary Clinton.

"God bless Mexico and the crazy gringos who want to give America to illegal aliens!"

Mexican Invaders Share American Values? Tell That to Fire Evacuees in California!

By John W. Lillpop

One of the most sickening arguments used by George W. Bush to justify his traitorous inaction on illegal aliens is the idiotic notion that invading Mexicans share common values with the American people.

Really?

When was the last time you invaded a foreign nation, violated immigration laws, and pilfered that nation's treasure? That is exactly what each and every illegal alien is guilty of when they come here uninvited, unwelcome, and illegally.

The notion that Mexican illegal aliens are nothing but common criminals was reinforced this week when six Mexican invaders were arrested for stealing food and water from a southern California evacuation center set up for those fleeing the wildfires.

Corruption Chronicles: http://www.corruptionchronicles.com/2007/10/illegal_immigrants_steal_fire.html

Can you imagine? Stealing food and water from people who have been driven from their homes to escape death and injury?

And that is an American value? Taking advantage of those who are suffering the devastating loss of homes and all earthly possessions?

Sorry, Mr. President, but real Americans share food and water with those in crises, rather than steal from them.

The bottom line is that every illegal alien has made a conscious decision to willfully ignore U.S. borders and laws for selfish purposes.

Illegal aliens are criminals the moment they cross our borders illegally. All too many of them add to their initial crime by stealing food and water or by stealing services to which they are not entitled.

Please listen, Mr. President: Those are NOT American values!

GOP Plans to End Illegal Immigration Flawed

By John W. Lillpop

Isn't it swell to have presidential candidates engaged in no-holds barred, full-scale food fights to see who can sound the toughest on illegal aliens? That is actually happening with the Republicans--sort of.

Fred Thompson began the bidding on Tuesday; Rudy Giuliani countered with his plan on Wednesday.

Both Thompson and Giuliani tried to sound tough and patriotic without confronting a critical part of the solution: Reversing illegal immigration by deporting the 38 million criminals who have invaded America.

Without a rigid program of enforced deportations, illegal aliens will continue to come, confident that the U.S. government will eventually reward their criminal acts with a path to citizenship.

That is not what America wants or needs, gentlemen.

America needs an aggressive program of deportations that accomplishes three primary objectives:

-Makes life as miserable as possible for illegals already here, thereby prompting mass self deportations;

-Sends a message to other would be invaders: Don't bother. Uncle Sam has finally caught on to the scam, and

-Makes homeland security and protection of American citizens the greatest priority when it comes to immigration policy.

Naysayers will instantly moan and groan that it is "impossible" to deport 38 million people.

Really?

How in the hell did the free loaders and scam artists get here to begin with? Channeled across the border by Democrats looking for votes? Or perhaps big business relied on alien abductions in order to meet its needs for slave labor?

Rubbish!

The invaders came individually, one by one, walking on their own two encroaching feet.

Note, please, that the uneducated, non-English speaking, impoverished peasants did not think that it was impossible to invade the greatest power on the face of the Earth.

So why in the world should that awesome power conclude that it is impossible to reverse the flow and send the criminals home?

The answer, of course, is commitment.

With 'conservatives' like George W. Bush and John McCain leading the charge, those who advocate rule of law and American sovereignty are accused of being racists and bigots, for heaven's sake.

More rubbish!

It is not necessary to root out the cancer of illegal aliens in one fell swoop. A reasonable and orderly procedure should be undertaken, and soon self-deportations will commence.

Once the world is witness to the fact that America is serious about our sovereignty and the rule of law, Mexico will be forced to deal responsibly with it's problems, rather than simply shoving those problems north across the U.S. border.

Securing the border is a vital and major priority. But the job will not be complete until the invaders already here are forced to go home!

Read Our Lips: NO New Amnesty!

By John W. Lillpop


To Harry Reid, most Democrats, all RINOs, and President Barack Obama:

We the people understand that the U.S. Senate is considering yet another idiotic attempt to grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens who have invaded the sovereign nation known as the United States.

With all due respect to the Majority Leader and other pro-amnesty colleagues, what Part of NO NEW AMNESTY do you not understand?

For the benefit of slow learners and those in denial, let us reiterate why the majority of Americans everywhere, from all political persuasions, are against amnesty for the criminals who have invaded America:

In short, we the people are:

FED UP with plans to merge the United States into a North American alliance with Canada and Mexico. Such a plan would destroy American sovereignty and is totally unacceptable.

FED UP with the refusal of the federal government to secure our borders at time of war.

FED UP when armed Mexicans illegally cross our borders and assault Americans, yet our government takes no action, and refuses to even protest.

FED UP when Americans defending the U.S. from drug smuggling illegal aliens are sent to federal prison, while invading criminals are to be forgiven via amnesty for violating our borders and laws.

FED UP with the fact that upwards of 38 million illegal aliens are currently in America, and cost taxpayers $113 billion dollars every year.

FED UP with a president who orders young Americans into harm's way thousands of miles from home, but who refuses to secure America.

FED UP with politicians who refuse to enforce immigration laws and who claim it is "impossible" to deport criminals here illegally.

FED UP with illegal aliens who can not and/or will not speak English.

FED UP with taxpayer dollars being wasted to print documents in foreign languages.

FED UP with illegal aliens who dump their medical bills on the backs of U.S. taxpayers, but who send $30-40 billion a year back to Mexico each year.

FED UP with the fact that providing free medical services to illegal aliens drives hospitals out of business, making those facilities unavailable to American citizens for whom the medical centers were intended.

FED UP with our schools being invaded by non-English speaking children who impede the learning process of students who genuinely belong here.

FED UP with the fact that federal, state, and local penal systems are overrun by illegal aliens, again costing taxpayers billions each year.

FED UP with the fact that, on average, illegal aliens kill 12 Americans every day.

FED UP with the fact that the overwhelming majority of felony crimes being investigated in Los Angeles have been committed by illegals from Mexico.

FED UP with politicians who refuse to round up and deport millions of illegal aliens who are destroying American culture and language.

FED UP with politicians who pamper illegal aliens with driver's licenses and free public services, which encourage even more invaders to come to America.

FED UP with the attempted Mexicanization of America. Mexico is a third- world slum, and we are FED UP with those who want America to be like Mexico!

Finally, Mr. President and members of the U.S. Congress, we the people are FED UP with those who consistently work on behalf of illegal aliens and the state of Mexico, and against the interests of the American people!

Please do not underestimate the dissatisfaction and rage swelling in the hearts of patriotic Americans on this vital issue.

We the people DEMAND our great country back!

Read Our Lips: NO NEW AMNESTY!

The Rise and Fall of Vicente Fox: A Five-Hour Thriller

By John W. Lillpop

Former Mexican president Vicente Fox spent most of last week sticking his intrusive nose into matters that are the exclusive domain of the American people and elected representatives, and which are absolutely none of the business of Mexico, it's current president, or any former Mexican president.

Interesting enough, Fox came to America to promote his new book, "Revolution of Hope" in which he rips his "friend "George W. Bush to shreds.

For example, Fox does not think too highly of W's Spanish, disparagingly calling it high school level.

I wonder if Fox realizes that high school Spanish far exceeds Bush's level of proficiency in English?

When he was not slicing George W. Bush into taco stuffing, Fox was unloading on the American people and the U.S. Congress. To begin with, Fox called Americans "racist" for demanding that our borders be secured and immigration laws enforced.

Fox went on to lecture that by insisting on the rule of law, we Americans are in danger of losing our "immigrant soul."

Good grief, there are upwards of 38 million non-English speaking alien peasants living here illegally! Most of whom are Mexicans, by the way.

And we have lost our immigration soul? And are racists because we will not let another 38 million in?

Who the hell does this moron think he is? Harry Reid? Ted Kennedy? John McCain? George W. Bush?

If only America had a president who could speak fathomable English and communicate effectively, Vicente Fox would have been told to shut his mouth and get the hell out of America before someone decked the damn fool!

But, alas, all we have is George W. Bush, and his 8th grade English and 10th grade Spanish!

Still, there is some good news to share on the trash Vicente Fox front.

Specifically, while Fox was blaming America for the fact that Mexico continues to be a third-world embarrassment that cannot feed, educate, house, or provide health care to it's own citizens, Mexican protesters in Boca Del Rio were having fun with a bronze statue of Fox just hours after it was erected.

These upstanding and obviously intelligent Mexicans began by egging the statute, after which the crowd fastened a rope around its neck and pulled it to the ground, breaking off the right hand and damaging the base.

Chron: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5212116.html

Holy Baghdad. That sounds very much like what happened to the bust of dictator Saddam Hussein back in 2003.

Of course, we all know how Saddam spent New Years Eve 2006, namely, swinging from a noose.

Wonder if that is Vicente Fox's destiny?

Dear Boca Del Rio protesters: Need rope?






John Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

Does America Need Hard Work/Thrift Tutoring from Pedro Zapeta?

Illegal Alien Pedro Zapeta Needs $49,000 to pay his Lawyer!

Satire By John W. Lillpop

Pedro Zapeta is the illegal alien who invaded America nine years ago to pursue a career in dish washing. By adding tax evasion to his skills set, Pedro was able to amass $59,000 over that nine-year period.

But after nine stimulating years, Zapeta decided he needed less challenging work, so he decided to return to Guatemala.

According to rumors spread by loiters outside several Day Labor centers in Miami, Zapeta planned to use that hard-earned $59,000 to start a government consulting firm.

His specialty? Showing Guatemala, Mexico and other third world governments how to escape the clutches of abject poverty.

Pedro's success model is really quite simple: Export your poverty to America!

Unfortunately for the rocket science major turned dishwasher, his decision to carry that $59,000 in a duffel bag through airport security put a crimp in his entrepreneurial visions.

Specifically, Pedro Zapeta was arrested and his small fortune confiscated by the U.S. government. Pedro has been ordered to leave America by January 2008, sans most of that $59,000.

But not everyone agrees that Zapeta has received the justice he richly deserves.

Writing in the Miami Herald, Ana Menendez sympathizes with the illegal alien:

"At a time when most Americans are deep in the red and the national debt rises by more than $1 billion a day, Pedro Zapeta may be the last man on earth who still embodies the great American ideal of thrift and hard work.

"He never owned a car, rode his bike everywhere and denied himself every luxury beyond rent and electricity. If Zapeta were wise to the ways of popular culture, he'd pitch a self-help book: How to Think and Grow Rich on Minimum Wage.

"Zapeta doesn't care about any of that. He just wants to get home to his family. That's understandable. But I think the authorities should reconsider.

Anyone who can amass $62,000 in nine years should be forced to stay here and teach the rest of us how to do it."

Miami Herald: http://www.miamiherald.com/548/story/266193.html

Of course, Menendez does not mention the fact that America's national debt includes hundreds of billions of dollars spent to provide education, health care, food, housing and other public services to illegal aliens like Pedro Zapeta.

Further, about 30 percent of America's prison and jail population is made up of illegal aliens, another huge expense dumped on the backs of American taxpayers.

Ms. Menendez also conveniently overlooks the fact that most Americans pay income taxes, a legal requirement imposed by the federal government and most states. Without the burden of income taxes, many Americans would be far less encumbered with debt and more likely to be rich like Pedro Zapeta.

As to Menendez's idea for a book, I agree that Pedro should undertake such a project.

However, rather than How to Think and Grow Rich on Minimum Wage, Pedro should pen a book titled, Get Rich by Invading America, Evading Taxes and Freeloading on the Backs of American Taxpayers, For Dummies.

To be published in Spanish only, of course.

As to Menendez's proposal that Pedro Zapeta should be forced to stay in America and teach the rest of us how to earn and save: Nice thought, but Pedro Zapeta is urgently needed in Guatemala.

After all, while Pedro was ripping off America, nine years worth of dirty dishes have been stacking up in Guatemala!

Go home, Pedro!