Illegal Aliens Must Go!

America was built by Immigrants--LEGAL immigrants. Illegal aliens have no legal or moral basis for being in America. All illegal aliens must be deported and U.S. borders must be secured to prevent more invaders from coming here!

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Oklahoma: Where Freedom, Rule of Law, and Patriotism Live!

By John W. Lillpop

With many of the several states headed toward ruination under the guise of being "progressive", the Great State of Oklahoma is moving in exactly the opposite direction.

Which means that Oklahoma is becoming a shining example of what can happen when citizens work diligently to protect and defend the ideals and culture that have made America great.

For instance, Oklahoma voters supported John McCain by nearly 2-1 over Barack Obama. Clearly, voters here understood that a vague promise of "change," buffeted by a handsome smile and media-produced charisma, are not enough to qualify anyone for the presidency of the United States.

In addition, both of Oklahoma's U.S. Senators, James Inhofe and Tom Coburn, are conservative Republicans. Three of the state's five representatives in the U.S. House are Republicans.

Oklahoma's state government is majority-Republican in both the House of Representatives and state Senate.

When it comes to the rule of law, Oklahoma is on the right side as well. This state has one of the toughest anti-illegal aliens laws in all of America.

That law has produced a very positive result: Illegal aliens are fleeing Oklahoma in droves!

Oklahoma has proven that Illegal immigration can be reversed, deportation can work, and that the rule of law can be enforced. All it takes is the political will and might to do the right thing.

Oklahoma: What all of America should be!

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Janet Napolitano for DHS?

Governor Napolitano looks for stranded illegal aliens as part of "Get out the Vote" effort for Obama

By John W. Lillpop

America is occupied by as many as 38 million illiterate peasants, AKA illegal aliens, and President-elect Obama has the gall to nominate Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano to head the Department of Homeland Security?

The same Napolitano who has done her level best to shield illegal aliens at the expense of American citizens?

The same Napolitano who believes that "Minute Man" refers to the sexual staying power of some border patrol agents?

Good grief, that woman, Janet Napolitano, is about as qualified to run Homeland Security as Vicente Fox or Felipe Calderon, Mexican presidents past and current, who believe that Mexico's northern border ends somewhere in rural Minnesota!

This is "Change We NEED," Mr. President-elect?

Not on your soggy taco!

America needs someone who believes that America is a sovereign nation rather than a poor suburb of Tijuana!

Someone who favors immediate deportation of anyone who speaks Spanish with a Mexican accent!

What next, sir?

How about a slot for William Jefferson, the Louisiana congressman who was indicted last year on bribery, racketeering and money laundering charges?

He is still a member of Congress, you know, although he faces a runoff in early December at about the time that his trial is about to start in Virginia.

Willie Jeff has the integrity, honesty, ethics, and personal charm needed to work in the Treasury Department.

Plus he is a brother, a huge plus in the administration so committed to CHANGE!

Then we have the rotund brother from New York, the gravel-voiced Charles Rangel who is in hot water with the IRS as a result of rampant racism.

You may have read that Rangel failed to report certain income, but racial discrimination is the real reason.

Why not make Rangel IRS Commissioner, which would enable the tax-evading rascal to root out honky bean counters and their green eyeshades, en masse?

Friday, November 14, 2008

Confused Priorities in Mexico City

Satire By John W. Lillpop

Mexico is a third-world nation that is unable to feed, house, and provide medical care for all of its citizens. Which is why America has been inundated with anywhere from 12-38 million illegal aliens from south of our border, most of who hail from Mexico.

Given the rampant poverty that is Mexico, one would expect Mexican government authorities to use public funds prudently and with caution.

However, that does not appear to be the case in Mexico City where Mayor Marcelo Ebrard says that his government will start handing out doses of one or two Viagra, Levitra or Cialis pills on Dec. 1. **

These medications will be issued, free of charge, to impotent men, 70 years and older, of which it is estimated there are 112,000 in Mexico City.

According to Mayor Ebrard, the city is implementing the plan because sexuality "has a lot to do with quality of life and our happiness."

No one can quibble with that, your honor.

However, housing, food, education, and medical care are also vital to the quality of life and happiness. Is Mexico City fully meeting the needs of it's citizens in those areas, sir?

Of course, it is really none of America's business how Mexico City, or any other Mexican city, uses public funds to serve it's citizens, EXCEPT for the fact that hundreds of thousands of Mexican citizens come to America illegally every year and partake of public services paid for by American taxpayers and intended for American citizens.

Why in the world should American taxpayers be responsible for providing essentials to Mexicans who are here illegally, while the Mexican government concerns itself with the sexual fulfillment of impotent men, aged 70 and over?

Or to be more precise, how do you say "Loco" in Spanish?


Tuesday, November 11, 2008

How Do You Say "Invading Criminals" In Spanish?

By John W. Lillpop

Update on the kerfuffel regarding the use of the term "illegal aliens" in Arizona courtrooms.

According to a spokeswoman for Arizona Chief Justice Ruth McGregor, the Justice has NOT banned use of the term "illegal alien" from court proceedings, nor is she even considering such a ban.

Rather, according to a video report which can be viewed at the link below**, Chief Justice McGregor merely distributed to the various justices serving on the state supreme court a letter from a group of cry baby Hispanic attorneys.

That letter, included at the link, does not appear to ban anything or even propose that anything be banned. It appears to be a simple FYI from the Chief Justice based on a cry baby letter sent by Hispanics with too much time on their hands.

Had the Arizona court rejected the term illegal aliens, which is actually set forth in federal immigration law, we would have been suggested that a more precise term be adopted: INVADING CRIMINALS!

How do you say "invading criminals" in Spanish?


Sunday, November 02, 2008

W. Lied About WMD? Not According to Oliver Stone!

By John W. Lillpop

Although W., Oliver Stone's fictional account of George W. Bush is mostly liberal pap, the film does have one redeeming feature:

Much to the consternation of Bush-haters everywhere, W. does not support the leftist notion that "Bush Lied, People Died" about WMD.

In fact, the film shows Bush as very frustrated and extremely angry at key players in his administration for botching the intelligence on WMD.

There were no scenes showing Bush and Cheney, or anyone else in the administration, engaged in a diabolical plot to fabricate intelligence in order to get 110 Democrats in the U.S. House and Senate to support the Joint Resolution for military force against Iraq.

Perhaps Stone simply overlooked those dark moments, a product of his advancing years? Or maybe the director omitted them intentionally out of concern for national security and troops still in harms way in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Yeah, right! And perhaps Bill Clinton really believed that his rendezvous with Monica Lewinsky in the Oval Office NOT sexual in nature!

Horse vomit!

If there were the slightest shred of evidence that Bush and crew fabricated WMD intelligence or lied about it to deceive Congress, Stone would have featured such information prominently!

Therefore, it is prudent to remember that well known Democrats and supporters were very outspoken about Saddam Hussein and his WMD before the war. Some of those quotes include:

“[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.”—From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998

“This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.”—From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe Lieberman, Harold Ford, & Tom Lantos among others

“Whereas Iraq has consistently breached its cease-fire agreement between Iraq and the United States, entered into on March 3, 1991, by failing to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction program, and refusing to permit monitoring and verification by United Nations inspections; Whereas Iraq has developed weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological capabilities, and has made positive progress toward developing nuclear weapons capabilities”—From a joint resolution submitted by Tom Harkin and Arlen Specter on July 18, 2002

“Saddam’s goal … is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed.”—Madeline Albright, 1998

“(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983”—National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998

“Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement.”—Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002

“The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability.”—Robert Byrd, October 2002

“There’s no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat… Yes, he has chemical and biological weapons. He’s had those for a long time. But the United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture than we were before September 11th of 2001… He is, as far as we know, actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn’t have nuclear warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we.”—Wesley Clark on September 26, 2002

“The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow.”—Bill Clinton in 1998

“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security.”—Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

“Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people.”—Tom Daschle in 1998

“Saddam Hussein’s regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal.”—John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.”—John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“I share the administration’s goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction.”—Dick Gephardt in September of 2002

“Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”—Al Gore, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.”—Bob Graham, December 2002

“Saddam Hussein is not the only deranged dictator who is willing to deprive his people in order to acquire weapons of mass destruction.”—Jim Jeffords, October 8, 2002--(Was an Independent)

“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”—Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002

“There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein’s regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed.”—Ted Kennedy, Sept 27, 2002

“I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.”—John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

“The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these weapons, allowing the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass destruction and the issue of proliferation.”—John Kerry, October 9, 2002

“(W)e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. ...And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War.”—John Kerry, Jan 23, 2003

“We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.”—Carl Levin, Sept 19, 2002

“Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for the United States.”—Joe Lieberman, August, 2002

“Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. During 1991 - 1994, despite Iraq’s denials, United Nations inspectors discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear facilities that Iraq was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various reports indicate that Iraq is still actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability. There is no reason to think otherwise. Beyond nuclear weapons, Iraq has actively pursued biological and chemical weapons. Inspectors have said that Iraq’s claims about biological weapons is neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish population. While weapons inspections have been successful in the past, there have been no inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt that Iraq has continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass destruction.”—Patty Murray, October 9, 2002

“As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”—Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998

“Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production.”—Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998

“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. And that may happen sooner if he can obtain access to enriched uranium from foreign sources—something that is not that difficult in the current world. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.”—John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

“Saddam’s existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons before, both against Iraq’s enemies and against his own people. He is working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle East.”—John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

“Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration’s policy towards Iraq, I don’t think there can be any question about Saddam’s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts.”—Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002.

And this from our favorite Frenchman:

“What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad’s regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs.”—Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002

Bottom line: W. did NOT lie about WMD. Furthermore, he was he was joined in his war efforts by a lot of willing Democrats!

Saturday, November 01, 2008

Whom Will Obama's Illegal Alien Aunti Vote For?


By John W. Lillpop

Ignoring the rule of law in order to enrich one's selfish self is apparently a genetic defect in the Obama family DNA.

At least that appears to be the case given Obama's renegade disregard for the law when it comes to illegal aliens, voter fraud, domestic terrorism, and even his own eligibility to be U.S. president.

Therefore, it should come as no great surprise that Zeituni Onyango is living in public housing in Boston and is the half-sister of Obama's late father, which makes her Obama's aunt.

She is also an illegal alien whom was instructed to leave the country four years ago by an immigration judge who rejected her request for asylum from her native Kenya. **

Of course, Obama claims that he did not know that his dear aunt was here illegally.

Just like he did not know that Bill Ayers has never expressed regret for his vile act of domestic terrorism.

Just like he did not know that his spiritual advisor, Jeremiah Wright, blamed the U.S. for 9.11.

Just like he did not know that ACORN was up to its eyeballs in voter fraud on his behalf.

Perhaps we now know why Obama has refused so adamantly to come clean on his birth certificate?

The dude is trying to avoid deportation as an illegal alien from Kenya!

The really big question: Are the Republicans checking to make sure that Aunt Zeituni Onyango is NOT being driven to the polls in an ACORN limousine and casting a vote for her non-citizen nephew next Tuesday?

The second most critical question: Does Aunt Zeituni Onyango speak Spanish? If not, why not?

The third most critical question: Where did Aunti come up with that $260 that she funneled to Obama, and has Obama returned said dirty money?