Mexico's High-Technology Solution to Illegal Immigration

By John W. Lillpop

"Mexico to use biochip to control illegal immigration," screamed the headline at earthtimes.org late last year. Without reading the small print, one could be lulled into assuming that our third-world neighbors were finally getting the message:

Illegal aliens from Mexico are most unwelcome in America!

Yahoo! would be an understatement of the reaction from these quarters should Mexico treat America like the world's sole superpower instead of a combination garbage dumpsite and day care center for illiterate peasants.

But, alas, the small print put the cork back in the champagne, for a couple of days anyway.

Turns out the aggressive program for dealing with illegal aliens pertains to foreigners entering Mexico through its southern border. You know, the untouchables from Guatemala that Mexican authorities have zero tolerance for.

Earthtime: http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/165487.html

That means that nothing has changed with regard to Mexico and its citizens intent on leaving Mexico to invade America. The Mexican government continues to hand out Map Quest and detailed instructions on how to invade Arizona.

In Spanish, of course.

According to the referenced Earthtime article, in 2006 the Mexican government nabbed 200,000 people trying to invade Mexico.

And how did Mexico handle those 200,000 invaders? Deport them back to Guatemala? Send them to prison to work on chain gangs for years on end?

Yahoo! NOT. Under the leadership of brilliant politicians like Vicente Fox and Felipe Calderon, the 200,000 were sold map quest maps, driven to the Arizona border, and forced to continue their northward journey across U.S. borders.

Incidentally, these are the same dunderhead politicians who threatened to take the U.S. to the United Nations because our government plans to build a border fence on U.S. property, using U.S. treasury!

The really big question: Are Mexican officials terminally stupid, terminally arrogant, or an ungodly combination of both?

A Worthy Resolution for 2008: Give Rule of Law a Chance!

By John W. Lillpop


The year about to be relegated to the annals of history bore witness to a profound awakening of the American people. In great numbers, We The People finally became aware of the fact that our elected officials have allowed as many as 38 million foreign peasants to thumb their noses at our borders, ignore our immigration laws, and occupy our nation.

With the awakening came action. On multiple occasions, President George W. Bush and accomplices in the Congress attempted to grant carte blanche amnesty to millions of invaders from south of our borders.

On each occasion, We The People rose to the occasion and went to war against conniving politicians whose first priority was to deliver a steady flow of cheap labor to big business and cheap votes to the Democrat party.

Using an arsenal of keyboards, high speed modems, fax machines, and tens of thousands of angry telephone calls, we let it be known that the priorities established by President Bush and the U.S. Congress were completely unacceptable.

We The People bombarded our elected representatives with the same message over and over and over again: It is not acceptable to sacrifice American sovereignty, the rule of law, and homeland security for cheap fruit and tomatoes.

Further, any "reform" that does not call for deportation of all illegal aliens, and which places the invaders on a path to citizenship, is amnesty. Pure and simple.

Amnesty is unacceptable. Pure and simple.

The people's rejection of amnesty has elitists in Washington wringing their hands in angst at what to do next. The status quo, they say, is unacceptable.

They are quite right about that, you know.

But America does NOT need to legalize 38 illegal aliens in order to solve the illegal alien crisis.

Existing laws, while not perfect, provide a more than adequate remedy. Those laws prohibit U.S. employers from hiring illegal aliens and mandate deportation of those here illegally.

All that is lacking is a commitment on the part of the president and the U.S. Congress to uphold their constitutional responsibilities.

Why not try this simple formula?

* Secure the borders with military force;

* Prosecute employers who hire illegal aliens, and

* Enforce all immigration laws, including deportations.

Our elected officials need to focus on the needs of the American people, rather than worrying about invading criminals being forced to "live in the shadows."

To hell with people living in shadows! Illegal aliens do not have any moral or legal basis for being here, and belong in the shadows, at least until our leaders muster enough cajones to deport them en masse.

Or, to put the issue in terms even an open borders advocate could understand, "Give Rule of Law a Chance!"

Why not make that a New Year's Resolution Mr. President and Ladies and Gentlemen of the U.S. Congress?

Ramos and Compean: Not Brown Enough?

By John W. Lillpop

Pity poor souls Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean. Owing to poor career and lifestyle choices and just plain rotten luck, the two have been cheated out of twelve and eleven years of freedom, respectively.

In reality, Ramos and Compean have only themselves to blame. Each foolishly chose to serve America in law enforcement, which meant a commitment to secure borders, the rule of law, and American sovereignty as agents of the Border Patrol.

Obviously terrible choices, especially for young Hispanic men better suited for flipping Big Macs, mowing lawns, washing cars and marching to protest the rule of law.

Even more incredible, the two actually chose to do their jobs to the best of their abilities. That really pushed the envelope.

The final straw came when Ramos and Compean chased illegal alien Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila back across the Mexican border, thereby preventing the thug from smuggling drugs into America.

Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila left America sans a few grams of brown buttocks blasted off his criminal being by a single shot from Ramos or Compean.

However, Aldrete-Davila was not injured too gravely, as he attempted to smuggle a "second load" of drugs into the U.S. on November 15, an indiscretion for which he was arrested.

WND: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58727

Unfortunately, last year our government was able to convict Ramos and Compean based on testimony provided by the drug smuggling illegal alien, Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila. That conviction lead to the brutal sentences imposed on the two in October 2006.

If only Ramos and Compean had been illegal aliens, things would have surely worked out differently.

To begin with, Ramos and Compean would have been defended by the ACLU, La Raza, the Democrat candidates for president, Hispanic civil rights activists, and stoked by Hispanic apologists Gerald Rivera and Rick Sanchez in the media.

Charges of racism and bigotry would have been levied against the prosecutors, and the sentences would have started a political firestorm of rage from coast to coast.

If the two had been illegal aliens, that is.

But Ramos and Compean are not illegal aliens. They are responsible American citizens who took their law enforcement responsibilitites seriously. As a result, the silence coming from the ACLU, La Raza and other Hispanic advocacy groups has been downright deafening.

Want to drive your blood pressure off the charts? Compare the injustice imposed upon Ramos and Compean with the fate of illegal alien Hector Velazquez-Nava.

This vermin from Mexico slammed his SUV into a car driven by director Bob Clark, famous for his award-winning film, A Christmas Story, in 1983. The crash killed both Clark and his 22-year-old son, Ariel Hanrath-Clark.

Hector Velazquez-Nava, an illegal alien from Mexico, had a blood alcohol level three times the legal limit.

For killing two Americans while in a drunken stupor, illegal alien Hector Velazquez-Nava was sentenced to six years in prison.

For doing their sworn duties, Ramos and Compean were sentenced to twelve and eleven years.

Perhaps they are just not brown enough?

Remembering Bob Clark, Director of "A Christmas Story"

By John W. Lillpop


Yet another Christmas has been made more joyful by being able to watch Bob Clark's delightful film, "A Christmas Story."

In many American homes, Clark's 1983 award-winning film has joined "A Christmas Carol," "It's a Wonderful Life," and "Miracle on 34th Street" as mandatory Yuletide fare.

Christmas simply would not be the "most wonderful time of the year" without watching all four of these great movies at least once each December.

Unfortunately for all who love Christmas, Bob Clark was not around to celebrate this Christmas. That is so because the prolific filmmaker, whose career spanned four decades, was killed in an automobile crash caused by a drunken driver in California on April 4.

Hector Velazquez-Nava, an illegal alien from Mexico, had a blood alcohol level three times the legal limit when he claimed the lives of both Clark and his 22-year-old son, Ariel Hanrath-Clark.

On October 16, Hector Velazquez-Nava was sentenced to six years in prison after pleading no contest to two counts of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.

According to some estimates, about 13 Americans are slaughtered every day, on average, by drunken illegal aliens like Hector Velazquez-Nava.

WND: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53103


Despite the carnage caused by illegal aliens, the mainstream media refuses to acknowledge and report the extent of the problem. Political correctness seems more vital than objective reporting, at least in some leftist news rooms.

In addition to media malfeasance in reporting the facts, America's political leaders, including our president, constantly argue that those coming here illegally from Mexico should be welcomed en masse because they hold values common to the American people.

One wonders if our so-called leaders are even aware of the horrors involving illegal aliens, too much alcohol, and the slaughter of innocent Americans?

Or do they simply not care?

The simple truth is that illegal aliens are not all good hearted, hard working folks who just come here to work. Many are violent criminals who should be rounded up and booted out of America before they commit more crime.

Moreover, illegal aliens do not share American values.

By definition, all illegal aliens are criminals, but most Americans are not.

Another example: Driving while drunk is considered "cool" and "macho" in Mexican culture, but is seen as stupid and recklessly criminal in America.

The solution? Our borders should be militarized to keep invaders out, and those already here should be rounded up and forcibly removed as soon as possible.

Illegals Aliens Say Adios, America Says Gracias!

By John W. Lillpop

As one who is adamant in the belief that English should be the only language in America, I am loathe to use Spanish for any purpose whatsoever.

However, I am tempted to make an exception for the great news currently coming from Arizona and Oklahoma. Namely, illegal aliens by the thousands are packing their bags and heading back to Mexico.

It is called self-deportation and is happening because of tough new laws that make it miserable for illegal aliens and employers who hire them.

Therefore, I say Gracias to each and every illegal who goes home to Mexico, or other third world nation of origin. Do not come back, and don't bother to write, even if you can.

And to George W. Bush and like-minded Mexi-nazis in Congress who insist that deporting 38 million free loaders and scam artists is "impossible," I say Look at Arizona! and Look at Oklahoma!

Illegal aliens will self-deport if convinced that the authorities are serious about enforcing the law. They will not leave if our leaders are stupid enough to give them driver's licenses, in-state tuition fees, free health care, and other perks.

The solution is to be tough enough to cause self-deportation to kick in.

Comprehende?

Mitt Romney: Ronald Reagan Clone In Sacred Underwear?

By John W. Lillpop

Bleeding heart types looking for a "minority cause" to advocate on behalf of in the 2008 presidential elections are torn between the candidacies of a woman, two African- Americans, a Hispanic, and a former mayor of Cleveland who is more of a communist than Vladimir Putin.

Tough choices, those, and all of them Democrats.

In the interest of fairness, however, the name of Mitt Romney should be added to the shopping list of those searching for an oppressed minority to support.

As a practicing member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormons), Romney is aligned with one of the most persecuted and oppressed minorities in history. Even in these enlightened times, millions of Americans say they would not vote for the charismatic ex-governor of Massachusetts under any circumstances.

And in an amazing demonstration of religious bigotry, a New Hampshire liberal rag, the Concord Monitor, used its Sunday editorial pages to tell readers why they should not vote for Mitt Romney.

This "anti-endorsement" is unprecedented, unfair, un-American, and unwise.

Editors at the Concord Monitor even went so far as to warn readers that Romney must be stopped" because he lacks the core philosophical beliefs to be a trustworthy president."

IHT: http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/12/23/america/Romney-Anti-Endorsement.php

That particular bit of editorial malfeasance is a thinly veiled assault on Romney's Mormon faith, pure and simple.

Fact of the matter is that Mitt Romney is the most conservative candidate running for the White House. He is also the most experienced and qualified, a fact attested to by his service as the governor of liberal-infested Massachusetts, and by his enormously successful personal finances.

Mitt Romney knows how to work with people from diverse political backgrounds, how to overcome discrimination and adversity, and he knows how to run a large organization. No other candidate comes close to matching his qualifications for taking over the Oval Office on January 20, 2009.

Best of all, Romney is intelligent, articulate, and an eternal optimist. He is a contemporary clone of Ronald Reagan, but in sacred underwear.

Unlike Reagan, Romney attends church every Sunday. Which in the Mormon faith requires him to spend the majority of his Sunday either in church, or commuting to and from church.

Mitt Romney does not attend church just to provide television cameras and photographers with photo ops. He attends church to practice his faith, which is what church attendance is supposed to be all about.

Discipline, dedication, decisiveness, decency, and devotion are attributes that Mitt Romney has developed through his church. Those attributes are also an urgent need for the presidency.

Looking for an oppressed minority? Think Romney!

Is Arnold Terminating Common Sense in California's Budget Crisis?

By John W. Lillpop

Can sleeping with a Kennedy wipe out one's conservative DNA? How about sleeping with a Kennedy AND having a gay chief of staff named Susan Kennedy?

This seemingly impertinent query is posed in light of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's curious proposal to release as many as 20,000 "non-serious, non-violent" prisoners in order to stave off a budget deficit that is $14 billion, and counting.

An even more urgent question haunts one's fiduciary consciousness: Why in the hell has California spent even a nickel to house, fed, and provide medical care for 20,000 people whose indiscretions are so benign as to not be worth punishing?

In other words, why imprison these people to begin with? As a political pay back to the prison guard unions, perhaps?

Assuming that most, if not all, of the inmates are in prison for good and proper cause, why are California's lawmakers and governor not considering other cuts in spending such as these:

1. Illegal aliens are estimated to cost the state $10.5 billion each year! Why not cut all public services to those not in the U.S. legally?

WND:http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42474

2. California legislators are the highest paid in the nation, at an average of more than $110,000 per year. Whatever happened to service and community spirit? Replaced by greed and opportunism?


3. Regulatory meddling in every aspect of life is driving businesses and middle class folks out of California. Productive citizens are being replaced by freeloaders and scam artists from south of our border.

California does not need to release any prisoners in order to balance the state budget. We do, however, need responsible governance when it comes to illegal aliens, excessive regulation, and the salaries of elected leaders!

Bush Should Retire Early--In Mexico!

Satire By John W. Lillpop

To whom is George W. Bush more loyal and sympathetic? Illegal aliens from Mexico or American citizens?

For the answer, look carefully at the photo--it shows illegal aliens scaling a border fence to invade America. And where is our goofy president?

Look closer. That is W waving a Mexican flag as part of his greeting ceremony for a chunky Mexican illegal just after she hopped the fence! Satire!

Given W's untreatable Mexican fetish, it may be prudent to simply shove him out of Air Force One, swaddled in a golden parachute, somewhere over Mexico City.

Remember that the man is 61 years old, and is obviously growing weary and older by the minute. Burned out seems an appropriate diagnosis.

And why shouldn't he be burned out?

After all, working 24/7 to help millions of illiterate peasants invade America is hard work that would wear anyone out!

Even more taxing: Trying to convince non-retarded Americans that the invasion is good for the U.S. economy.

Still even more taxing: Selling the notion that granting amnesty and a path to citizenship to criminals is vital to the national interest.

Just keeping a straight face while delivering that snake oil pitch day after day would be enough to drive most people into mental meltdown.

One wonders: Is that where our president and Mexico's most powerful insider mole is headed?

Some of W's recent pronouncements seem to confirm that his mental stability is "borderline," to say the least:

In April, W roared that amnesty is needed to take pressure off the borders! 38million illegal aliens in our midst and there is too much pressure on the borders?

In May, W said that the amnesty bill before the senate would restore rule of law.

Really? That is almost like saying, "America is governed by the rule of law, except when inconvenient to large corporations and elitists. In which case, congress and the president will simply change the law to legalize what had been illegal, thereby acquitting those guilty of behavior once considered unlawful."

Using the same logic, perhaps we should work to end the crime of armed bank robbery by simply expunging laws that make it unlawful to rob banks?

It was also in May that W appointed a war czar to take over the messes he has created in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as any other wars he might fancy between now and January 20, 2009.

While he was at it, one wonders why W did not appoint a border czar to shut down the borders and begin deportations?

Or is that Michael Chertoff's responsibility when he is not busy campaigning for amnesty or auditioning for acting roles as The Anti-Christ?

In June, W declared that he will throw an extra $4.4 billion dollars at border security, if only the senate will reconsider S 1348.

This dilly begs the obvious question: If $4.4 billion will make America safer and is vital to homeland security, why has W not acted sooner?

Like September 12, 2001, just to pick a random date out of the air?

Clearly, W is struggling to keep track of his missteps and dances around the truth. He seems to be losing that battle, and needs a long, long, stress free vacation.

We the American people also need a rest. We are BUSHed, to put it mildly.

And other than Bush 41 and his sidekick, Moms Bush, who honestly believes that America can survive another 12.5 months of the W "Presidency and Legacy Building Enterprise?"

Perhaps a few patriotic Republicans should quietly visit the Oval Office and convince W to hang up his pilot's helmet and take early retirement.

Offer him an attractive golden parachute package and a luxurious villa in Mexico, and W might just take the bait.

Dropping W on the Mexican side of the border would serve other purposes:

Americans would exact a measure of revenge against Mexico for dumping millions of illegal aliens on the American side of the border, and

Best of all, America would have one less English-challenged amnesty crusader to deal with!

God Bless American Patriot Tom Tancredo!

By John W. Lillpop

Of all the presidential candidates on both sides of the ideological divide, only one man really understands the issue of illegal immigration and its potential to destroy America.

That man, of course, is Tom Tancredo who has been unflinching in his support for securing our borders, enforcing the rule of law, defending American sovereignty, and preserving American language and culture.

Unlike his Republican colleagues, excepting only Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo has not found it necessary to "reinvent" himself by glossing over earlier positions on one of the most volatile issues in American history.

Representative Tancredo has been for America from the get go, and as such he has been a vocal opponent of illegal immigration for many years.

He had the courage to speak out against Republican President George W. Bush and the GOP Congress for failing to honor their sworn oaths to defend America from invasion.

Tancredo truly understands that unless illegal immigration is prevented, and reversed, America is destined to fall into a third-world abyss akin to that of Mexico and other Latin American nations that currently ship their problems north for U.S. taxpayers to contend with.

Until quite recently, Tom Tancredo was a "lone voice," when warning U.S. politicians and the public that America has been, and continues to be, invaded by millions of criminals from south of our border.

However, because of his intelligence and ability to articulate, Tom Tancredo has been a major force in bringing illegal immigration to the forefront of issues being debated in America.

Without Tom Tancredo sounding the alarm, the Democratic congress and our "conservative" president would surely have conspired to enact amnesty for the 38 million criminal aliens now here, which would have been seen as a big green light to another 40 million with designs on invading America.

In October, Tom Tancredo saddened patriots by announcing that he would not seek reelection as a representative from Colorado in the U.S. House. Terrible news, yes, but who can blame the gentleman for fleeing from the likes of Speaker Pelosi and other enemies of America now occupying the U.S. capitol?

Even worse news came on December 20 when Tom Tancredo announced that he was abandoning his presidential campaign.

Why, oh, why are we losing Tom Tancredo? Why not Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, or Mike Huckabee throwing in the towel? Why not give Fred Thompson last rites, and let him doze off while en route to Hollywood to star in another smash hit television series?

In the final analysis, Tom Tancredo has provided the American people with an invaluable public service by alerting us to the dangers of a cockeyed congress and president working against the best interests of We the people, the constituency they are supposed to serve.

While I regret that I will not have the chance to vote for Tom Tancredo for president in 2008, I take pride in the fact that I did vote for the man in 2004. Having had enough of Dubya to last a lifetime, I wrote in the name of Tom Tancredo for President.

That fact can be confirmed with the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters in California. Unless my ballot has been destroyed by an illegal alien working in the Registrar's office!

God bless and keep Tom Tancredo!

Fleeced Naive Duh?

By John W. Lillpop

To elitist renegades like George W. Bush, most Democrats and all RINOs, We the People are naive dimwits who can be ignored with impunity when it comes to deciding the future of America.

With such a mind set apparently the norm in Washington these days, is it any wonder that our government has undertaken the methodical "Mexicanization" of America, without regard to the wishes or desires of the American people?

In fact, rather than the traditional Merry Christmas greeting usually extended this time of year, an appropriate holiday greeting from Bush and his partners in crime on capitol hill should be " Fleeced Naive Duh!"

But regardless of the greeting, the facts are the same.

Namely, our government is fleecing We the Naive by:

Refusing to secure our borders during time of war, while ordering 160,000 young Americans into harm's way thousands of miles from home,

Allowing upwards of 38 million illegal aliens to occupy America, costing American taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars every year.

Allowing illegal aliens to dump medical bills on the backs of U.S. taxpayers, while the same illegals send $30-40 billion a year back to Mexico. This travesty drives medical centers out of business, making those facilities unavailable to American citizens for whom the facilities were intended.

Refusing to enforce existing immigration laws and claiming that it is "impossible" to deport invading criminals as required by law.

Failing to confront, or even protest, the incursion of armed Mexicans across our borders and on to American soil.

Incarcerating American citizens serving as border patrol agents for defending America from drug smuggling illegal aliens.

Pandering to illegal aliens who can not and/or will not speak English, thereby wasting taxpayer dollars to print documents in foreign languages.

Permitting federal, state, and local penal systems to become overrun by illegal aliens, again costing taxpayers billions each year.

Pampering illegal aliens with driver's licenses and free public services, which encourage even more invaders to come to America.

Instead of this Mexicanization of America, our politicians should be telling illegal aliens to "Go Home for Christmas--and Do Not Come Back!"